Home > English > The National Assembly in the French Institutions > Synthetic file 13
File n° 13
At election time, political parties and candidates have a substantial amount of expenses. Until 1988, no specific legal structure actually covered the financing of these expenses. This loophole encouraged certain abuses which have been curbed progressively by measures taken since 1988. The current mechanism, which has been gradually fine-tuned over fifteen years, is based on several fundamental principles : — The legal recognition of a juridical status for political parties. The Constitution provides political parties with two objectives :
Parties fulfilling these objectives can take advantage of public financing. — Safeguards must be attached to party and candidate resources to guarantee transparency and avoid secret financing and the pressures imposed by financial powers.
Thus, since 1995, public authorities have decided to cut all financial links between companies and political parties and to definitively prohibit legal entities, whatever they may be, from taking part in the financing of political life. — Election expenditure has been capped both to avoid a continual rise in communication expenses as well as to ensure greater equality between candidates outside of their personal wealth. — To offset the lack of membership financing, which has always been quite small in France, the State has set up a system of financial aid to parties and of reimbursement of campaign expenses, provided that the parties strictly follow the laws which govern such spending. — Non-respect of such laws can have a series of consequences for the perpetrators (legal penalties, financial penalties and ineligibility for election which has the effect of temporarily forcing those who take the risk of electoral fraud to withdraw from political life). — The implementation of the rules concerning the financing of parties and election campaigns falls within the remit of an independent committee, the National Committee on Campaign Accounts and Political Financing (CCFP), which is under the authority of the administrative courts. — The estate of M.P.s is checked at the beginning and end of each term in order to be sure that they have not taken advantage of their office to gain undue wealth. This verification is carried out by a second body, the Committee for Financial Transparency in Political Life (CTVP).
I. – the financing of political parties 1. – The expenditure of political parties Political parties have all sorts of expenses. These include : — Salaries for permanent members of staff ; — Rent of offices and premises ; — Material, secretarial and postage expenses ; — Advertising and communication expenses ; — The writing, printing and distribution of various publications (newspapers, pamphlets, brochures etc.). In particular, parties spend large sums of money at election time, as can be seen from the campaign expenses of the three main candidates at the 2002 presidential election : Candidate Total Cost of Campaign Jacques Chirac............................ € 18,030,826 Lionel Jospin.............................. € 12,506,834 Jean-Marie Le Pen .................... € 12,050,718
2. – The resources of political parties In order to finance their expenses, political parties have two main sources : private financing, which is usually generally small and public aid from the State, which has become the most substantial amount.
a) Private Financing Like any association, political parties may receive dues from their members. In practice, such membership contributions only represent a tiny fraction of the resources of the party (the membership fee received from local officials and M.P.s is generally higher but such practices vary from party to party). Parties may have other private income but only within the limits of legislation which is becoming stricter and stricter : resources coming from commercial or industrial activities of the party, bequests etc. This category also includes donations from natural persons, which are covered by the laws of 1995. Despite the existence of tax incentives, voluntary contributions from natural persons have remained quite small. Since 1995, legal entities, whatever they may be (often companies), are no longer allowed to make the slightest donation nor to offer the slightest benefit in kind to political parties.
b) Public Financing Public financing is covered by a series of laws enacted between 1988 and 2003. These laws, by introducing State financial aid to political parties and groupings, set up the process of their public financing, which today is predominant. Thus today, allocations set aside for political parties and groupings are included in the annual Finance Bill. They amount to €73,283,613 for 2007 (Initial Finance Law for 2007, programme 232-01 of the budget of the Interior Ministry) divided between more than 40 parties or groupings. These funds are divided between the political parties in two allocations : — The first allocation (50%) depends on their results at the first round of the previous general elections. This part of the public financing helps parties with candidates in at least 50 constituencies and who obtained at least 1% of the votes cast (added in 2003, this provision aimed at reducing the sharp increase in candidacies which had grown from 2,888 at the first round of the 1988 general elections to 8,444 in the 2002 campaign) ; — The second allocation (50%) goes to the parties represented in Parliament. Only those parties which have received funds through the first allocation are eligible for the second (this avoids the setting-up of false parties in Parliament with the sole aim of receiving public financing). In addition, in order to answer a demand of the Constitutional Council not “to hinder the expression of new ideas, opinions and movements”, the law provides for a fixed public financing (€ 304,900 in 2005) for recently established parties whose “financial representative” has collected donations from, at least, 10,000 natural persons.
c) Other Types of Public Aid to Political Parties The State also provides political parties, in subsidiary ways, with means which could be considered to have a financial equivalent and can thus be seen as indirect financing : — Political groupings which are represented by parliamentary groups at the National Assembly or the Senate, have a right, outside of election campaigns, to “air time” on public radio and television channels ; — The State grants political parties tax reductions (company tax at a reduced rate) on certain of their own revenues (the rent on their developed and non-developed buildings for example).
II. – the financing of election campaigns The current measures in force are based on several principles : — Private financing can only consist of donations coming from natural persons or from political parties (donations from parties have no limit while those from natural persons cannot exceed € 4,600) ; — The most expensive campaign expenses are prohibited (television and radio advertising and, in the three months prior to the election, telephone and computer marketing, press advertising and poster campaigns) ; — Electoral expenditure is limited according to the number of inhabitants. Thus for a general election, this limit is €38,000 per candidate plus an allowance of €0.15 per inhabitant of the constituency ; — Each candidate must appoint a “financial representative” who may, according to the case, be a natural person or an association dealing with electoral financing set up in accordance with the Law of 1901 on associations. This financial representative is the only person/body authorized to collect funds which will be used to cover election expenses and to make payments to cover expenses (the candidates are thus prohibited from having any direct financial dealings). He/it must set up a campaign account which deals with all the revenues and expenditures linked to the election campaign. This account, which is passed by a certified accountant, will be submitted for inspection to the National Committee on Campaign Accounts and Political Financing (CCFP). The CCFP will either approve of (if need be, after revision) or reject the campaign account which has been put before it. In the case of rejection, the CCFP refers the matter to the electoral judge who may, if an irregularity is established, announce the resignation of the elected candidate and the ineligibility for election of the guilty candidate for one year (thus disallowing him from standing at the subsequent election) ; — If the account is accepted, the State grants candidates with at least 5% of the ballots cast at the first round, a reimbursement which can reach 50% of the expenditure limit. In other words, this mechanism allows the candidate to have his campaign expenses covered 100% by the State if he manages not to spend more than 50% of the authorized limit. On top of direct aid to candidates, the State also covers a variety of other expenses (printing of ballot papers, circulars, cost of postering in the spaces set aside for this. Those candidates who gain at least 5% of the votes cast are reimbursed on the basis of an official scale).
III. – transparency regarding an M.P.’s estate The aim of the 1988 laws, as well as dealing with the financing of political parties and election campaigns, was to ensure transparency regarding an M.P.’s estate, so as to check that he did not take advantage of his elected office to gain undue wealth. Thus the obligation to make a “declaration of estate” at the beginning and end of each term of office, was introduced. The checking of such “declarations of estate” is carried out by the Committee for Financial Openness in Political Life, which is made up of high-ranking judges
|
![]()